Planning application at 163A-164 Greenhill Road, Parkside SA 5063
April 25, 2019, 10:37 p.m.
We agree entirely with Emma Miller. Developers and corporate land owners are constantly targeting trees they erroneously propose as dangerous or inappropriate when, in fact when inspected, it is obvious the trees are not dangerous and, to the contrary, provide green cover, shade and amenity to the property and Greenhill Road streetscape. It is unconscionable that applications to remove healthy green cover such as 163a/164 Greenhill Rd persist for their own selfish reasons when there remains a local community who are directly ignored and, as a consequence, de-valued.
From Sylvia Wade to local councillor Michael Hewitson
Couldn’t agree More. Hopefully we are doing a DPA at the request of a developer who verbally stated that they are happy to have the mandatory 15% tree cover with deep root zone in the rules for the property!
Also had great noises back from State Cabinet about a 15% rule for Unley as a test case. Some way to travel so I am also sending this to our planning staff.